I like this argument. So for those in Iraq who don't want us there this argument justifies killing Americans. Iraq was an autonomous state. America didn't like Sadam (who did?) so we intervened into a soverign nations internal politics by waging war ageainst the country to remove their undesirable dictator.
There were no weapons of Mass Destruction There were no links between Iraq and Al Queada. Bush just wanted to oust Sadam. I'm sorry but that isn't a good enough reason to wage war. So your argument would provide enough justification for freedom fighters within Iraq to attack the American insurgents. After all the Americans attacked Iraq. >what rights does a terroristic rag tag group of fighters deserve? >they have no allegiance to any recognized nation or army, they are >simply enemy combatants, right? > >i guess im of the belief that if you try to kill me, i could care less >what happens to you, moral or not, you messed up first, its your pain >to pay. > >yes, we SHOULD try them, but under what court of law? non that they >will ever recognize nor accept, nor care about. we have opened up an >jihadist nest of bees and im not sure we are EVER going to be able to >do anything to repair it. > >other than remove bush and start showing some compassion ;) > >tw > > > >On 6/15/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| All-in-one: antivirus, antispam, firewall for your PC and PDA. Buy Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=60 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:160999 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
