Tony Weeg wrote: > http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm > particularly the first story, about a controlled demolition of the > twin towers, rather than the jet fuel melting of the steel support > beams and weight of them crushing down? > strange conspiracy theory id say...
I read that last night. Guy didn't say what specific evidence he had... the most relevant line was merely "Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings." I wish the reporter had included a LINK to specifics, rather than just alluding loosely to someone's judgment... story has already gotten more play than it deserved as-written. Then again, June is a slow news month, and during a campaign it's important to feint and jab from multiple angles. jd ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:161012 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
