> Larry wrote: > Which to me is a good idea. Its time to put this dead issue to rest. >
I think the issues is newly born rather than dead. They are: 1.) Who the guardian of a incapacitated person and where do their rights begin and end. 2.) What rights does marriage allocate? 3.) Do the courts mean anything anymore or have we become a country of sides? While some might say they, "as long as it's not a court I can come to any opinion I want", what they don't realize is that if they are using that opinion to forward a policy, then they're irresponsible since they're directly undermining the legal system as well as it's core principles. For example, The FL whatever-protective agency was asking for legal action based on this hearsay that was many times shot down in a court. Once shot-down the hearsay purveyors claimed the court was biased, corrupt, etc. This is policy based on hearsay not on laws and courts. Look at the MJ trial - he's found innocent of every charge yet the anti-MJ still maintain his guilt and some have even called the trial "a sham". That suggests they'd like to change the legal system and based on what? Hearsay. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:161363 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
