> Why should the constitution protect government publicity? Because the alternative will limit (eliminate?) the number of positive confidential sources reporters receive which may actually help a bad situation. We're cutting off a finger so that we can punish someone who made us stub a toe. I guess the fear is that the precedent of allowing it will cause them to make us stub our toe so often that we'll have to amputate it. This might be seen as a major boon to people in power who are doing bad things since they'll have to worry a lot less about the potential of whistle-blowers.
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:162447 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
