>I think because a majority of people: > Are worried by corporate corruption (enron, global crossing, etc) > Are worried by financial corruption (traders indicted, financial > services companies indicted) > Are worried about making the wrong decision, and being left with nothing. > Are worried about having to take on one more burden (figuring this stuff > out) > Are worried that their neighbors are even more likely to make bad > decisions, becoming a future source of worry/need. > Are worried that the rich and powerful are somehow going to make out > even better. > Are worried that the poor will suffer more than ever.
Yep, that's why it's optional. If these things concern you, don't do it. > Don't trust the governement to EVER do anything that actually, really > benefits the people. > EXACTLY. So get some of your money OUT of their control. You've listed some good reasons why some people might opt not to privatize some of their fund, but i've yet to see any good argument as to why the choice to do so shouldn't be offered to people. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:164743 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
