> Brian wrote: > Taking terrorists alive is nothing but a hassle. >
Good point. It's part of my problem with GitMo. I understand the argument either way, but maybe here's a solution: Define the "war on terror". That way you can say that this guy was a soldier of the terrorists and therefore criminal procedures don't apply. Now the challenge moves from his treatment to his disposition which, for this guy, would be easy to prove. That's my problem with Mr. Bush's policy: he's not doing anything to define the war on terror and, eventually, people will get fed up with the ambiguity. I already am. He should get a bunch smart legal dudes together to field a proposal. But, back to your point, pinning them down and unloading a clip into their brain stem does avoid that hassle. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:165980 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
