Facts don't matter, it's the seriousness of the charge :) On 7/22/05, Robert Munn wrote: > OK, this is where you lose me. Looking back to his original statements in > 2003, I think it is fairly clear that the President does not know who leaked > Plame's identity. How can the President protect someone when he doesn't know > who it is he is protecting? Really, I think you are making way too much out > of the President's silence. > > What if the original leak came from Colin Powell? After all, he had the Plame > memo. While we don't know for sure who else saw that memo, we can be > reasonably sure that he saw it. Rove has already denied seeing it, although > he certainly could have learned of the contents from someone else in the > White House. > > If the original leak was from Powell, should he be prosecuted? I think it is > highly unlikely that he was the source, BTW, but who knows how this will > shake out? > > >3.) These no reason for the President's silence unless he's protecting > >someone despite the serious nature of the charge. > > > > > >Conclusion based on facts we already know: Mr. Bush is protecting his > >friend(s) over national security. > > Unsupported by the facts. To protect them he would have to know something- > who the leaker was, what they said, etc. There is zero evidence that he knows > anything about the leak. >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:166047 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
