How many times have we had this discussion? On 8/2/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about as a theory that does not mention Jesus Christ, Allah, Budda or > Loki? If we're talking about science, it is, another theory of how life > developed on Earth, regardless of whether or not you choose to believe it. > > Put another way, it should be either all or none. The teaching of evolution > directly conflicts with many, if not most, religious explanations. To teach > only evolution would be in effect a religious/anti-religious movement > (atheism?) which serves to undermine the religious teachings that the parent > conveys onto the child. > > Further, even if you consider this purely religion, rather than science, the > Constitution says that no prohibition to practice religion will be condoned. > That part of the Constitution is usually forgotten in the effort to atheize > (my new word) the US. > > Matthew Small > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 4:54 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Bush wants religion taught in the science classroom > > Not even as history? > > On 8/2/05, Kevin Graeme wrote: > > Religion shouldn't be taught in public schools. > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:167680 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
