I don't think that is right. It seems to me that either a) or b) could, by itself, define the first meaning or usage.
If not, then b) alone would have surficed (designated a drug by the Act) On 8/9/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now wait a minute. You might want to re-read your definition. > > There were 3 different definitions, labelled 1-3. Any of which could > identify a "drug". However, definition 1 had two subsections to it, a) and > b). > > So for a substance to satisfy definition 1, it had to both a) be used in > diagnosis, treatment or prevention AND b) be recognized or defined by the US > Food Drug and Cosmetic Act. > > Sugar might be used to treat certain conditions, but if it aint listed in > that Act...it aint a drug. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| All-in-one: antivirus, antispam, firewall for your PC and PDA. Buy Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=60 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:168619 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
