On 8/16/05, Gruss Gott wrote: > Your argument does indeed sound silly. Hussein (I wasn't aware you're > on a first name basis with him) ...
Yeah and he said to tell you it's Mr. Hussein to you :) > So the question remains - if you agree with invading any country that > doesn't pose a clear and present danger to the US then you are a > chickenhawk. Since it's been discovered that Hussein was not a clear > and present danger (i.e., no WMD), continued support for the war is to > be a chickenhawk. I'm so tired of this "Iraq was never a threat argument." Take off your blinders. > BTW, all of the nationbuilding BS is right out of Liberal 101 isn't > it? You know: "we are the world's policeman" and "the US is > responsible for all peoples of the world." No. Liberal 101 states trust the UN to protect the world, sit back and do what they say. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169620 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
