+1 on all points. >> And the last time I checked, the Bush Administration hadn't said ONE BAD >> THING about Ms. Sheehan. > > > And, honestly - they don't need to. Neither party needs to "get its hands > dirty" in matter like this since both have plenty of rabid extremist > groups > more than willing, without direction, to do it for them. > > I honestly wouldn't be surprised to find somebody like Rove behind some of > this... but that would just be going "above and beyond" in my opinion > since > he doesn't have to lift a finger to get the exact same results. > > What I look for is the party response to the smearing of an opponent. > They > are not required to respond, but in some cases a response would, in my > eyes, > greatly increase my respect for the people involved. > > I was disappointed that Bush didn't refute attacks on Kerry's war record. > I > was disappointed that Kerry didn't refute charges that the Bush family was > "in bed" with Bin Laden. > > I was very pleased, during the VP debate, when both Cheney and Edwards > decided to completely, gracefully, side step the ridiculousness > surrounding > Cheney's daughter. > > Jim Davis > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169905 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
