Sam wrote: > Oh yeah, sorry about that. It's between line one and two of paragraph six. :)
? Paragraph six of the linked NYT story is a single sentence, without mention of Gorelick, or her role in "the wall", or her failure to recuse when investigating herself. I'm guessing that you were using some sardonic humor there...? ;-) (My interest: It's always good to know how current events are framed, and the angles that different reporters and businesses both play up and ignore.) jd ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Flash MX Pro from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=57 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:170071 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
