You're putting words in my mouth. I never said we shouldn't have retaliated against those who carried out 9/11. But I feel that the action taken was insufficient and not necessarily aimed at the right people. After all, how many Afghans flew those planes? And I doubt those 200,000 people living the refugee camps would consider the operation an "astonishing success". I don't even think Shrub and his minions would rank it that high.
On 8/26/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So we should have enacted zero retaliation on the Taliban government? Our > failure to find Bin Laden is a disaster. But the overall operation in > Afghanistan has been an astonishing success. > > Even you blind haters must see that. > > > Not the way he did. OBL is still free, and the warlords in control in > > Afghanistan now are only marginally better than the Taliban. We're > > stuck in the mire there and will be for years. There are almost > > 200,000 Afghan's who are displaced from their homes, and the > > situation is so bad in some places like Kandahar that the aid workers > > cannot even get to the refugee camps to provide aid. > > > > On 8/26/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> You wouldn't have removed the Taliban government from Afghanistan? > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how to get a fax number that sends and receives faxes using your current email address http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=64 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:171152 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
