Who, you must admit, are just not as prevelent as the Mohammads and Alis. I look at it a lot like a SPAM filter. Not just one criteria should necessarily flag something as spam, but certain criteria have been shown to be much more reflective of a terrorist than others.
Each criteria should be weighted SMARTLY using common sense gained from years of successful profiling. But terrorist weighting should differ from SPAM filtering in that we should lean towards less false negatives even if that means more false positives. (As long as the false positives aren't treated with as much finality as the London guy.) On 8/26/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, "muslim" comes to mean anyone > brown-skinned, and overlooks the timothy mcveighs and john lindts. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:171261 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
