Most homes will have to be bulldozed due to the water damage. Would be nice to see them use some of the soil they can get out of the old miss to help raise the city but if they will keep some sections intact which might cause flooding problems with just heavy rains.
On 9/5/05, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think it might make sense in some areas that are totally underwater and > destroyed, where buildings will need to be bulldozed anyway, to think about > bringing in rocks and soil to raise the level of the ground before > re-building. The real question, I suppose, is whether the infrastructure is > salvagable. If streets and sewers and so forth can be saved, then it doesn't > make sense to plow under whole sections of the city and build over it, even > though all the homes might have to be razed and re-built anyway. > > > >"It looks like a lot of that place could be bulldozed," he said in an > >interview Wednesday with the Daily Herald of Arlington Heights, Ill. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:172642 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
