I agree, even though am glad she is out there. No question she wanted to be arrested. So why oblige?
On 9/27/05, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > She's the type who will stand at the fence with her finger almost touching > it saying "I'm not touching, I'm not touching" and daring them to arrest > her. > > > > Sounds like you've gone through the coverage pretty thoroughly. So let's > > say > > you are right. Cindy Sheehan is outside the White House sitting on the > > sidewalk. This violates her permit. You arrest her and provide her with > > the > > opportunity to look like a martyr. Or you do nothing and the story goes > > away. Which is smarter? > > I am assuming here that she wasn't actually climbing the fence or doing > > anything else that could be construed as a threat. As it is, she gets > even > > *more* coverage when this thing goes to trial. Unless the feds get smart > > and > > refuse to prosecute. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:175212 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
