Take the whole thing with a grain of salt. Neither side is known to tell the 
truth. Neither side is to be trusted. Even the reporting side (which is a 
BBC documentary) is known to be biased against Bush/America so it should be 
questioned as well. When I read something like this I look at who's doing 
the reporting (AFP reporting on a BBC documentary), who's being quoted (a 
Palestinian official), what their history is (lies, false reports and broken 
promises) and who they're talking about (Bush - need we say more). All this 
makes it look like a puff peace done with a specific goal in mind rather 
than a true reporting of the facts.
At least that's my take and I just ignore the whole thing and laugh at 
people who will use it to criticize Bush. If I was meaner, I'd try to sell 
those same people a bridge.

(Bush has done so many things publicly worthy of criticism that something 
like this is just a joke)

> Problem is that logic goes both ways.
>
> Has Bush been known to lie?
> Has his administration been known to lie?
>
>
> Crap now what?  Who do you believe?
>
> Again, not saying Bush made these statements, there is no way of ever
> really knowing.
>
> I'd say I expect better from the President of the USA and his staff but
> truth is, I don't. They've descended into the realm of deniability and
> obstruction rather than the truth.
>
> Remember "I did not have sexual relations with that girl". Then later on
> the quote was something like "well according to my staff and legal
> counsel a blow job does not constitute sexual relations, so I thought I
> was telling the truth".
>
> How about the Iran Contra Affair?  Watergate?  Its not party specific,
> they all lie and try to obstruct the truth from being told.  No wonder
> we're skeptical.
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Look at the source here. Has the source been known to lie? Has the
> government of the source been known to lie? If the answer to both of
> these questions is yes, then this is just the BBC blowing things out of
> proportion again to try and embarrass Bush.
> I'd say I expect better from them but truth is, I don't. They've
> descended into the realm of tabloid rather than news source.
>
> Confidentiality Notice:  This message including any
> attachments is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender and
> delete any copies of this message.
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:176427
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to