my point remains, 29% (being generous) is no mandate.

On 10/21/05, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/21/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. voter turnout was less than 60% of all eligible voters
> > 2. Shrub got just under 51%.
> > 3. therefore he recieved .51 * .6 = 30.6% of the total eligible voting
> > population.
> >
> > lets play with your numbers then .553 *.51 = .282 or only 28.2 % of
> > the eligible voting population voted for Bush.
>
> While this math is technically correct, it doesn't actually defend
> your argument without a little qualification.
>
> Valid: " Over all less than 31% of all [eligible] voters went for
> Bush, some mandate."
> Invalid: "Over all less than 31% of all voters went for Bush, some mandate."
>
> Since, if you didn't vote you aren't a "voter".  Just because I own a
> car doesn't make me a driver unless I actually drive the thing...
>
> -Cameron
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:177745
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to