Since DeLay was not connected in any way to the murders in Florida or the Casino Scam your analogy makes no sense.
On 10/22/05, Gruss Gott wrote: > > Well, Sam's argument is so ridiculous that it wasn't worth responding > to, but since I have a bit more patience today I'll say that: > > 1.) Yes, guilt by association is a valid critique in general, but it's > circumstantial. > 2.) The circumstances in this case clearly prevent it being logically applied. > > If we were to make Sam's analogy logically consistent with this case > it'd go something like this: > "Many of my local actions look to be directly connected the wife > beaters club as they have directly benefited them. Even knowing that > my friend's club favors wife beating, I've called him "one of my > closest friends" on numerous occasions." > > "My wife has been photographed numerous times with bruises and cuts > and has also often mysteriously "been sick"." > > "But just because that guy looks to be convicted of wife beating > doesn't mean I'm guilty." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:177896 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
