> Robert wrote: > Incidentally, I still don't think there will ever be any indictments over the > actual leak.
There is the cryptic reference to "official A" as the person that told Libby that he had talked with Novak about Ms. Plame and that Novak would be writing a story about Ms. Plame. When Mr. Fitzgerald was asked about the identity of "Official A" he said he couldn't say any more than what was in the indictment. In other words, he didn't have enough evidence to charge "Official A" with a crime because Libby was obstructing justice. This puts Libby in a horrible spot: 1.) Take it to trial, drag the Whitehouse through hell while doing it, possibly jeopardize 2006 elections, and still maybe go to jail, or 2.) Cut a plea bargain which I doubt Mr. Fitzgerald would do without getting some information which would surely be the evidence necessary to indict "Official A" otherwise known as Rove. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:179018 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
