> Brian wrote: > How come Woodward's opinion was important when he spouted off > against Bush, but suddenly aren't important when he's downplaying the Plame
Well, I'm not sure what you mean by "spouting off", however here's how I see his relevance: 1.) Mr. Woodward did loads of research on the administration, including interviewing the President and VP, and wrote a book that detailed events leading up to the Iraq invasion. This gives him the authority to speak about the personalities, motivations, and facts surrounding the Iraq invasion and the "war on terror". 2.) Mr. Woodward did not, to my knowledge, do any research into the Plame case nor is he in any position to speak about national security. So the point is that Mr. Woodward isn't universally knowledgeable. He has his area of expertise and the Plame case and national security are not it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:182649 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
