That's nice. Please answer the question.
You said: Further, the intelligence they received was product put together by > the administration which didn't include dissenting opinions > proportional to the size and facts of the dissent. That's a fact > admitted to by the Whitehouse and the CIA. And I gave you a link to the NIE that they had read at least up to page five. The first paragraph said "See INR alternative view" and had a link to the dissenting opinion on the aluminum tubes. I realize you don't want to get into the minutia of it but if we don't start ticking off things that aren't true you will keep using them as if we never discussed it. So, do you agree that they did have a fair amount of dissenting views and it's more likely the Dems are not being truthful about the lead up to war? On 11/18/05, Gruss Gott wrote: > I'm not sure what you think I'm saying so I'll to be very precise: > > Where I agree with the Administration > ---------------------------------------------------- > 1.) A stable democratic Middle East was, is, and will be in the > strategic interest of the US. > > 2.) Hussein was a horrible dictator that ethically needed to go. > However, I'm not agreeing that 's the US's responsibility. > > 3.) Pressuring Hussein on WMD seems appropriate given the intelligence > that seems to have been available at the time. As I don't have a > security clearance I can only speculate. > > In short, Hussein needed to go, and it's a good thing he's gone. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:183029 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
