Let's assume that I am asking. It is standard practive to use the stuff as flares, right? But to shoot it at people? And yes, I realize that there are quite a few people here who know more about military practice than I do.
On 11/22/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you have any experience with or knowledge of standard military > equipment and procedures outside of what you read in the press? I > recommend asking military personnel how common incendiary grenades are > before deciding whether using them is unusual and improper. We have a > few vets on the list you could ask. > > Of course the US and British "admitted" to using them if it's standard > ordinance. Duh! This whole story from the beginning has smelled like > bad propaganda to sway the uninformed. > > Remember, war sucks. It's crappy, nasty and ugly. It is, at its core, > about killing people to achieve a goal. Next we're going to be > complaining that the US is shooting people with real bullets and > require a lawyers signature before each round is shot. Bah. > > > On 11/21/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The US and British admitted it so it's not bs. > > > > Their position, depending on who you talk to, seems to be either > > > > 1- It was not used against civilians > > or > > 2- A little confused on the lawyer answer but it is either that we did > > not sign the treaty that bans it or it may not qualify as a WMD under > > the treaty. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:183694 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
