oh yeah, legally sure. That's like Libby probably not getting convicted because of the definition of the crime, is what I am saying.
Do you think incendiary weapons should be used against civilian targets? Dana On 11/22/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The use of WP in Falluja is a non-issue. Its been an accepted muntion > since WWII. It never has been considered to be a chemical weapon. The > treaty some have been ranting about has been the protocol on using > incindiary weapons on civilian targets. The US has never signed it in > the first place, so how can its provisions apply? > > larry ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Homesite Plus with Dreamweaver from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=55 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:183699 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
