Personally I would go with the single server. If you can try to tie in with the apps, if they are simple don't spend too much time trying if you can re-write them faster.
Can it be done in two months? sure! why not? One thing I have had to do in the past was develop a session management system. I had to tie a few different system together and the easiest way to do that was to develop a session system that used the same database to keep track of everything. At 10:31 AM 12/21/2001 -0500, you wrote: >ok, we just had a firm re-alignment > >i was told yesterday that a new intranet needs to be in place by march 1st. > >i am in charge or the east intranet. >done in CF, has about 30 small to mid size apps i have built. > >on the west coast they use asp. >they have about 15 apps they have built. > >i was told that they agree CF is the way to go to quickly merge the 2 site >into one seamless app. >now, can this be done in 2 months? > >if so, should i re-write there apps using cf, or just tie into them? > >what are your experiences with doing this. > >i am flying out to Seattle on the 7th, to strategize ion this. > >at the very least we want to have all current, pertinent content converted >with the new style >& one consistent look. > >but on a larger scale what would be the best way to do this right. >have the 2 servers both running cf server ent & mirror the content. > >or to have 1 server that all offices tie in to? > >if i was to mirror data on both coasts, how would i go about maintaining the >content? >if something changes on one server how do i auto update it on the other! > >"oops, i crapped my pants." > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
