The fact that it's a unix based product might be a good reason why I'm not using it. I don't have a unix box or even a spare box to load linux up on (if it ran on linux).
> You may not need Squid, but I think that you'd be suprised at the > speed improvement even on totally static .html files, not to mention > ..cfm files that require processing time from CF. You can avoid > spending CF threads and memory and free up more resources for "real" > CF requests. Often, depending on how often the file is requested, > Squid will serve it straight from RAM, skipping the hard drive read > all together. > > Many high traffic sites like CNN.com use Squid (or similar) cache > accellerators for static image files. You can scale out with as many > Squids as you need while only keeping one CF (or other) source machine > in the background - making it a very cool scalability enhancer. > > -Cameron ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:184497 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
