That doesnt seem like such a bad idea...option A that is.
Unless if you dont pay you have to wait for a crazy amount of time.
Well unless you only have to wait for non emergencies.

On 11/29/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well there are lots of ideas...
>
> a) you can pay for priority service, but all services will remain free if you 
> are willing to wait
>
> b) you have to pay for all non-essential services, the definition of which to 
> be determined by a third party (sort of being done now)
>
> ><sarcasm>
> >Tier 1: rich people get treated great.
> >Tier 2: poor people get screwed.
> ></sarcasm>
> >
> >(I don't know anything about the proposal, but I'm probably not far off.)
> >
> >
> >On 11/29/05, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hrm thats nice to know but tell me about the 2 tier healthcare idea.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Protect your mail server with built in anti-virus protection. It's not only 
good for you, it's good for everybody.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=39

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:184619
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to