A bomb that levels an entire city block doesn't concern itself whether there are terrorists, or children in that city block. The US in this and the Afghan conflict has not been too concerned about "collateral damage."
On 12/15/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You think we're killing the innocent civilians? The coalition forces > just walk down the street spaying crowds with gunfire hoping to kill a > few terrorists in the crowd? > That's extremely sad that you think that and I doubt there's anything > I could say to convince you how wrong that is. > > > On 12/15/05, Wayne Putterill wrote: > > I explained it once to someone like this - > > > > Imagine that the police were going to clean up your area, they would > > go all out to catch all the criminals possible. > > > > Now thats a good thing, and most people would agree with it, but what > > if for every criminal caught the police knocked on a random number of > > doors and shot whoever answered in the face, man woman or child. > > > > Would you still support it if it was the only obvious way to get rid > > of the criminals? Or would you say that the price was too high? > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Protect your mail server with built in anti-virus protection. It's not only good for you, it's good for everybody. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=39 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:188274 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
