It doesn't say a warrant is required, it just said the search cannot be unreasonable. It provided for a means to ensure a reasonable search.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:28 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned > > Amendment IV - Search and seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791. > > The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and > effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be > violated, > and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or > affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the > persons or things to be seized. > > > Not only is the warrant required, but they have to say what people and > things they are looking for. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189167 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
