Exactly. > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:29 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > > OK, so in this case. Say the government makes a deal, and > they bring in a big store, that store creates jobs that > weren't there before. It provides items that weren't > available before, and provides other items at a better cost > than before. > > Doesn't this benefit the individual? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:22 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > > > > If you're for smaller gov't, shouldn't the local gov't not > be getting > > involved in the free market? > > > > Those tax breaks give wal-mart an unfair advantage over other local > > businesses. So its gov't intruding into the free-market. And road > > construction isn't cheap. When was the last time a state redid > > highways just for a mom and pop shop? > > > > I'm still hearing that gov't benefitting corporations is good while > > gov't benefitting individuals is bad. > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192731 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
