Gruss,

Do not, I repeat do not even begin to assume you know what I think.

On 1/17/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dana wrote:
> > But to answer your real point, why do you oject to treating large 
> > corporations differently?
> > There usually is an exemption for companies with fewer than ten or so 
> > employees.
> > Why is it any differnt to expect a little more from the really large ones?
> >
>
> Here's the real difference between the sides that I can see (please
> correct me if I'm mis-stating it):
>
> (1.) You, Larry, and others feel that because a business is
> successful, agents of the government should be able to force it to
> help solve social problems.  Further, you think that people who
> voluntarily accept positions with the company need the government's
> defense.
>
> (2.) T-Bone, Nick, and others want as little gov't as possible and
> especially don't think those that have worked their ass off to get
> what they have should be penalized for it.
>
>
> And now ... it's time for an anecdote.  Here's why I get pissed with
> the penalize-the-successful attitude:
>
> My wife recently graduated from business school.  To send her cost us
> over $120,000.  Plus the school she went to was in another state so
> she had to commute by plane for classes and stay at hotels.  We paid
> for all of that.
>
> While she was going to school she worked a full time job and had a
> part time contracting position.  She was getting about 4 hours of
> sleep a night which is about 5 hours less than she needs.
>
> When she finished school she got a job in that distant city forcing us
> to up our commuting and living costs and putting a further stress on
> our marriage.
>
> Well, those moves are just starting to pay off for her.
>
> If I understand your position, you're saying that she should be
> penalized for her risk and hard work because it's paid off.  This is
> your point for Wal-mart, right?  It started out small, grew big by
> risk and hard work, and now we should penalize it because it makes a
> profit.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192698
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to