That's hot. Kevin Graeme wrote: > Yeah. Basically if the pictures aren't of appropriate attire for > people in the office, then they aren't work safe. It's not a question > of nudity so much as sexual objectification. > > On 1/19/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>seriously? >> >>tw >> >>On 1/19/06, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>how about a nsfw tag please,,, > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193311 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
