http://www.antiwrap.com/?857

"Intelligent design" not science: Vatican paper

By Reuters
http://news.com.com/Intelligent+design+not+science+Vatican+paper/2100-11395_3-6028924.html

Story last modified Thu Jan 19 13:17:00 PST 2006

advertisement

The Roman Catholic Church has restated its support for evolution with
an article praising a U.S. court decision that rejects the
"intelligent design" theory, saying it is nonscientific.

The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano said that teaching
intelligent design--which argues that life is so complex that it
needed a supernatural creator--alongside Darwin's theory of evolution
would only cause confusion.

A court in the state of Pennsylvania last month barred a school from
teaching intelligent design (ID), a blow to Christian conservatives
who want it to be taught in biology classes along with the Darwinism
they oppose.

The ID movement sometimes presents Catholicism, the world's largest
Christian denomination, as an ally in its campaign. While the Church
is socially conservative, it has a long theological tradition that
rejects fundamentalist creationism.

"Intelligent design does not belong to science and there is no
justification for the demand it be taught as a scientific theory
alongside the Darwinian explanation," said the article in the Tuesday
edition of the newspaper.

Evolution represents "the interpretative key of the history of life on
Earth" and the debate in the United States was "polluted by political
positions," wrote Fiorenzo Facchini, a professor of evolutionary
biology at Italy's Bologna University.

"So the decision by the Pennsylvania judge seems correct."

Evolution Confusion

Confusion about the Catholic view of evolution arose last year when
both the newly elected Pope Benedict and his former student, Cardinal
Christoph Schoenborn of Vienna, said humans were part of an
intelligent project designed by God.

An article by Schoenborn in The New York Times in July seemed to
signal a Church shift toward intelligent design because it played down
a 1996 statement by Pope John Paul that evolution was "more than a
hypothesis."

This triggered a wave of "Vatican rejects Darwin" headlines and
attacks from scientists, Catholics among them, who argued that had
been proved man evolved from lower beings.

Schoenborn later made it clear the Church accepted evolution as solid
science but objected to the way some Darwinists concluded that it
proved God did not exist and could "explain everything from the Big
Bang to Beethoven's Ninth Symphony."

The Church, which has never rejected evolution, teaches that God
created the world and the natural laws by which life developed. Even
its best-known dissident, Swiss theologian Hans Kueng, echoed this in
a recent book in Germany.

Schoenborn said he spoke up because he shared Benedict's concern,
stated just before his election last April, that a "dictatorship of
relativism" was trying to deny God's existence.

Tenet of Faith

Pennsylvania Judge John Jones ruled that intelligent design was a
version of creationism, the belief that God made the world in six days
as told in the Bible, and thus could not be taught without violating a
ban on teaching religion in public schools.

It was not science, despite claims by its backers, he said.

This literal reading of Genesis, the first book of the Bible, is a
tenet of faith for evangelical Protestants, a group that has become
politically influential in the United States.

Many U.S. Catholics may agree with evangelicals politically, but the
Church does not share their theology on this point. Intelligent design
has few supporters outside the United States.

While not an official document, the article in L'Osservatore Romano
had to be vetted in advance to reflect Vatican thinking.

The Seattle-based Discovery Institute--the main advocate of ID--said
on its Web site that reading the Osservatore article that way amounted
to an attempt "to put words in the Vatican's mouth."

Story Copyright (c) 2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.


Copyright (c)1995-2006 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.

--
Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment;
and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your
opinion.

Edmond Burke

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193746
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to