That's a Patriot Act issue and needs to be dealt with separately. On 1/22/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > Who is to say that it will stop with so called terrorists. Why not go > a bit further and go for those who disagree with the ruling regime. > > The point is that without the judicial oversight there are no controls > or an independent party to say that wiretapping person X is > unconstitutional. It falls into the realm of unreasonable search and > seizure. Already government agencies are conducting unauthorized > wiretaps on anti war groups. Who is to say that it will stop there, > why not tap political opponents? Thats just going a bit further. > > larry > > On 1/22/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If Bin Laden calls your neighbor the NSA has to hang up? WTF. That's > > just stupid. > > > > On 1/22/06, Tim Heald wrote: > > > Dude seriously, get your head out of your ass. > > > > > > The Bush administration has had more warrants denied than any other > > > administration. The Bush administration has repeatedly been called to the > > > mat for civil rights violations. The Bush administration has already > > > pushed > > > the Patriot Act into being used to combat drug dealers. > > > > > > Here is where I disconnect with you and Gruss both. NO ONE should have > > > this > > > ability. You should not be able to spy against American Citizens without > > > a > > > warrant. Period. I don't care ho they are and hat they did. > > > > > > He who would give liberty for safety deserves neither. > > > > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193749 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
