Who is to say that it will stop with so called terrorists. Why not go a bit further and go for those who disagree with the ruling regime.
The point is that without the judicial oversight there are no controls or an independent party to say that wiretapping person X is unconstitutional. It falls into the realm of unreasonable search and seizure. Already government agencies are conducting unauthorized wiretaps on anti war groups. Who is to say that it will stop there, why not tap political opponents? Thats just going a bit further. larry On 1/22/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If Bin Laden calls your neighbor the NSA has to hang up? WTF. That's > just stupid. > > On 1/22/06, Tim Heald wrote: > > Dude seriously, get your head out of your ass. > > > > The Bush administration has had more warrants denied than any other > > administration. The Bush administration has repeatedly been called to the > > mat for civil rights violations. The Bush administration has already pushed > > the Patriot Act into being used to combat drug dealers. > > > > Here is where I disconnect with you and Gruss both. NO ONE should have this > > ability. You should not be able to spy against American Citizens without a > > warrant. Period. I don't care ho they are and hat they did. > > > > He who would give liberty for safety deserves neither. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193744 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
