true. but who cares now... she didnt get to attend. and thats what was wrong. i doubt she could have been well behaved... but she has that right to attend, right?
i dont know, washington is sooo screwy, and wow, the rhetoric from both sides is RATCHETING UP quite loud! tw On 2/1/06, dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > update to the update, charges against bother were dropped. Appropriately imho. > > http://www.forbes.com/business/feeds/ap/2006/02/01/ap2493431.html > > >Interesting sideshow: > > > >http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/13768131.htm > > > >> http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog/index. > >> cfm/2006/1/31/State-of-the-Union-2006--a-live-blogging-experience > >> > >w00t! > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195478 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
