Always the insults. If you cannot reposnd to the ideas, you try insults. Its really quite pathetic. It remids me of a 10 year old's reaction.
perhaps you ought to read the articles. Look what I said, perhaps bush was less than forthwrite about his contacts with Abramoff. Given that he claimed that he had no real contact beyond a meet and greet photo with Abramoff. However Abramoff is claiming multiple and numerous contacts for the last several years. I made no judgement when I presented these articles. Any bashing is what you appear to read into my presentation. Read up on projection as a defense mechanism, the more you rant the more it appears to fit your particular style: http://psychology.about.com/od/theoriesofpersonality/ss/defensemech_5.htm On 2/10/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dude you're foaming at the mouth. > You need to slow down with this non-stop Bush-bashing. Guilt by > association only works in the minds of the Loony-left. > Why don't you discuss Ried's relation with Abramoff? I didn't see you > engage in that thread. How about the leaking of a top-secret NSA > operation? Why not discuss Carter making a fool of himself or Hillary > Clinton's plantation? How about Dean spending all the DNC money? You > seem to have tunnel vision and it's not very attractive. Also you > might want to put on that shiny cap :) > > > On 2/10/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > Bush may not have been all that forthcoming when he claimed no real > > contacts with Abramoff: > > > > http://www.antiwrap.com/?885 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:196775 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
