Only if we know there's a problem. And then there are the back and forth fights like in the early days of the ColdFusion entry about adding or removing Bluedragon or resources.
As for these studies, I'd like to know which ones as I've heard much lower numbers in Slashdot a month or two ago. >I have heard of studies that say Wikipedia is statistically about as >accurate as an encyclopedia- somewhere around 97% accuracy. While that is >pretty good, it still means there is 3% inaccuracy. > > The good thing about Wikipedia is that informed people like yourself can > fix the inaccuracies. > >> False scholarship irks me and Wikipedia, as a bastion of 'add your own >> scholarship' irks me to no end. Have we gone so far as to say >> everything is relative and nothing is true. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197855 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
