in that case i would say that the scholoarly thing to do is to say that there are two opinions about the matter and cite the references for each one. then the individuals can decide for themselves...
>And as I said, a scholarly fight. I have history on my side and someone >removed my edits because he says the source contradicts what I say. His >source is controversial and is not know for historical accuracy, but it's >the source used so the fight is on. This is the overwhelming weakness of >wikipedia, acceptance of any source by any person and alteration of any >information by any person for any reason. Doesn't say scholarship to me. >Yeh, I'm pissed. > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197879 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
