When presented two opinions, one of which is completely basesless, it's a very easy decision for all people with simple reasoning ability. Some people clearly lack that ability, but that's not really my problem.
-Cameron On 2/23/06, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If one of the opinions is completely baseless, then that's not an easy > decision, it's easy to make the "false" opinion so realistics that it seems > more true than the real one. Bad idea. It's like saying that the CIA had > Kennedy killed - conspiracy theories. > > - Matt > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cameron Childress" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:58 PM > Subject: Re: Wikipedia sucks > > > > Then it should be an easy decision for anyone reading the two opinions > > and wants to decide for themselves. > > > > On 2/22/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Except that one opinion is based on a false premise that is not supported > >> in > >> history. > >> > >> > >> > might be a solution. > >> > > >> >> in that case i would say that the scholoarly thing to do is to say > >> >> that there are two opinions about the matter and cite the references > >> >> for each one. then the individuals can decide for themselves... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197994 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
