> -----Original Message----- > From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 4:27 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: colour vision evolved to detect blushes? > > Neither does denying thousands of years of written history. > > It's a personal thing, that's what I'm getting at. This is an argument > that > can have no resolution unless you die and meet God, die and don't meet God > (unless you're in Hell) or you go back in time. That's why it's personal.
For my part the only argument that I'm concerned with here is whether or not these concepts should inform science education. In that sense the argument is completely impersonal - can these beliefs EVER be scientifically investigated? No. So they're not science and shouldn't be in science classrooms. I'm also reacting to the recent cases where school boards not only tried to add Intelligent Design to the curricula but also attempted to literally change the definition of science to allow for the existence of non-falsifiable within a science framework. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198843 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
