>I look around a bit more and I was wrong. the solomon amendment
> requires that military recruiters get the same support as other
> corporate recruiters.

Ok, that is what I had been reading too. Seems completely fair to me.

>
> that said I still disagree with the coercive nature to this. It still
> seems to be the government requiring that the universities go directly
> against their own human rights policies.
>
> larry

I would hope that a university's human rights policies provide for an equal 
opportunity for their students. Denying recruiters for the military access 
to their campus, even though they receive federal funds, solely because the 
university doesn't like the military...doesn't sound very fair to me. Nor 
would this policy seem to respect the human rights of university students 
who may be interested in a military career.

I guess I don't see this as coercive. If you want the funds, just allow the 
same access to these recruiters as you do everyone else. If you are SO anti 
military that you can't even handle that simple request....that's ok, but 
don't expect these federal funds. Seems fair. 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:199158
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to