Isaac, there's a difference between talking on a cell, even with an
HFD compared to talking with another person. Because of the limited
information feedback in a cell phone conversation, we have to pay more
attention to the conversation than if the person was in the vehicle.
That's because the information stream has a considerably greater
bandwidth, consequently the person has more attentional resources that
can be applied to driving.

larry

On 3/13/06, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What they really need to do is pass a law that prohibits talking in a
> moving vehicle. Yeah! Yeah! You know, I've seen so many wrecks that
> could have been easily avoided if the driver had simply not been
> talking to his passengers! And then we can follow up the
> un-enforceable no-talking law with automotive manufacturing laws that
> require cars to be manufactured with a sound-proof box around the
> driver's seat so that it's physically impossible for the driver to
> talk to anyone else (or reach into the other seat to set down or fetch
> a map, etc.). Of course, the car stereo will only be audible to the
> passengers and it'll be illegal to use a handheld stereo in the
> sound-proof box. Drive, drive and more driving. That's all they should
> be doing. And I guess they shouldn't be talking either, so we'll have
> to also have the automotive manufacturers build a device into the seat
> that gives the driver a mild electrical shock if they talk at all.
>
> This whole thing is such utter garbage nonsense... it's bullshit all
> the way around, I'm just really amazed how people refuse to see it.
>
>
> > Whoa, freaky six degrees of separation. Erwin's son is in
> > my daughter's
> > class.
>
> > On 3/12/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> http://www.antiwrap.com/?935
> >> From the  Psychological Science Web site:
> >>
> >> 'Hands Free' Isn't Mind Free: Performing Even Easy Tasks
> >> Impairs Driving
> >>
> >>
> >> The study was conducted by University of California, San
> >> Diego
> >> scientists Jonathan Levy and Harold Pashler, along with
> >> Erwin Boer of
> >> ERB Consulting. Their research appears in the article
> >> "Central
> >> Interference in Driving: Is There Any Stopping the
> >> Psychological
> >> Refractory Period?" in the March issue of Psychological
> >> Science.
>
>
> s. isaac dealey     434.293.6201
> new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
>
> add features without fixtures with
> the onTap open source framework
>
> http://www.fusiontap.com
> http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:199789
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to