Just what the conversation needed . six foot seven of stupid :) On 3/17/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wayne, just be glad your fellow countrymen a generation ago didn't "grow > out", otherwise, you'd probably be speaking German. > > > > > Wayne Putterill wrote: > > I'm not anti american, I'm anti anyone who makes this world a worse > place to be. > > > > I'm not bashing america, my own country had a large part in this > > disgusting affair. > > > > As for calling me antisemetic, anyone who knows me would laugh out > > loud at that - particularly my jewish friends. > > > > I would lay down my life for something I believed in, but I grew out > > of playing with guns when I started wearing long trousers. > > > > On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> There were no weapons found, there is no was to ever prove they did or > did > >> not exist at this point. > >> > >> BTW Why is that "spin"? Are all of my statements true? > >> > >> How about you stop with America bashing bullshit? And the anti-Semitic > >> bullshit that you lefties like to spout. It makes me sick. How about > >> instead of sitting around bitching you actually stand for something, > with > >> not only your principles, but your life on the line? > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Tim Heald > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> 703-300-3911 > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:51 AM > >> To: CF-Community > >> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack > >> > >> how about you actually deal with the point being discussed instead of > >> spouting another load of spin. > >> > >> On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> How about the violations of the cease fire? > >>> > >>> How about the UN resolutions allowing us to use force to enforce the > >>> sanctions that were being violated? > >>> > >>> How about the attacks against American Aircraft? > >>> > >>> How about the fact that oil is actually of vital importance to the > >>> national security of the United States? > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Tim Heald > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> 703-300-3911 > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:16 AM > >>> To: CF-Community > >>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack > >>> > >>> That's what blows all the "this means we were right to go in" > >>> arguments apart. We had ways of finding out if he did have WMD and the > >>> UK and US governments didn't let the people involved finish their > work. > >>> > >>> On 3/17/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Just a reminder the people on the ground, the UN inspectors who were > >>>> in Iraq, and the IAEA always said that there were no WMD's. > >>>> > >>>> On 3/16/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> When you have your own guys, plus other countries all agreeing > >>>>> that they have them, then the risk factor seems within the bounds. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you try it and you turn out wrong, then people second guess, > >>>>> which is good if it makes us better, but when the point is just to > >>>>> belittle then it doesn't help anybody. > >>>>> > >>>>> Were mistakes made? Clearly. However I don't think they could have > >>>>> done this any other way. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:13 PM > >>>>>> To: CF-Community > >>>>>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Dino wrote: > >>>>>>> Israel only attacked Iraq when they were building a nuclear > >>>>>>> reactor > >>>>>>> > >>>>> for > >>>>> > >>>>>> the > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> express purpose of gaining nukes to attack Israel. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Combine that with what gMoney said and you have: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1.) If we thought there was a threat, why didn't we just bomb > >>>>>> the shit out of it w/o having to go in? Lame Answer: mobile labs. > >>>>>> Apparently REALLY mobile. So mobile they don't exist. Which > >>>>>> brings > >>>>>> > >>> us to ... > >>> > >>>>>> 2.) Why don't we know how reliable our intelligence is? From > >>>>>> the beginning the whole everybody-thought-blah-blah-blah strikes > >>>>>> me as absolutely moronic. It's called risk management - I know > >>>>>> they offer classes at HBS on the topic. Bush must've skipped them. > >>>>>> Whenever you have intelligence you have a reliability factor on > >>>>>> it. Either ours was low and we went in anyway or we haven't > >>>>>> learned shit about intelligence in the last 50 years. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200488 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
