> Yes, but then you are attacking this guys science. Which is what it is > all about.
Well, i'd be attacking his science by using an aspect of a biblical story's literal interpretation....and there's just such a disconnect there that the two don't seem to go well together in any regard. > I am not backing the facts. I am fascinated that he is pursuing it at > all. And that he may have found a logical explanation to an incredible > miracle. Perhaps. Next i'd like to see him try to find a logical explanation for Jesus' greatest miracle: the resurrection. Now that'd be interesting...... > > It makes me then wonder, could it maybe NOT have been a miracle? Did > Jesus claim it was? Did observers just get it wrong? Was there some > kind of "telephone" mutation of the story? Was it a David Blaine-like > misdirection? But then you always wondered that anyway, right? I remember reading about the common scientific explanation for Moses' parting of the Red Sea. It's really a pretty convincing arguement actually... and this ice-walking thing kind of follows that same line. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203174 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
