The irony here is that the disclosure of the information is not a relevant issue in any part of the inverstigation. The relevant issues are lying to the feds and contempt of court. It is all quite convoluted at this point.
On 4/10/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The contempt of court was the refusal to disclose a confidential source, > which is an integral part of journalistic ethics. I know the trrm brings a > laugh these days, but Bush managed to find some people that had them. > Interesting that Woodward declined to publish. One of these times' I'd like > to see the logic on that. > > -- --------------- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203572 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
