Didn't I just debunk this article? Yes I did, go up six messages to the post with: Michael Ledeen Sixteen Words, Again The myth of a great sin lives on. http://www.nationalreview.com/ledeen/ledeen200604100726.asp
The first paragraph is: Dafna Linzer and Barton Gellman provide their gullible readers with a reprise of one of the great myths of the runup to the Iraq war: that President Bush used blatantly false information to justify the war. Let me explain it again for you. The forgeries appeared three months AFTER Wilson returned from Niger. They were not used as evidence against Saddam. They were not part of the NIE that was declassified. The reason Wilson was sent in the first place is still valid and Wilson himself confirmed the meeting with the Iraqis. The forgeries were created to fool people into believing the whole issue was discredited, but that only worked for the likes of the Washington Post reporters and a few gullible people:) On 4/10/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > LOOK SAM LOOK: > > Libby's grand jury testimony, described for the first time in legal papers > filed this week, Cheney "specifically directed" Libby in late June or early > July 2003 to pass information to reporters from two classified CIA documents: > an October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate and a March 2002 summary of > Wilson's visit to Niger. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203665 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
