true. But it works both ways. Do I need more than an offhand dismissal by Scott McClelland at this point to believe the Post is mistaken, you'd better believe it.
I think that those who are calling for declassification of the reports have a good point. If more information is in the country's best interest, then having complete information is even more so. >I need better than unnamed sources who's identities were confirmed by >other unnamed sources. Do I believe there is a team of people that saw >them and don't think they are weapons labs, yes. > >The Post article states that two of the three teams that examined them >first hand claim they are weapons labs. > >So it seems we have a disagreement between two sides, and specific >information that is still classified from all three teams. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:204194 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
