I agree about that, it's an ugly possibility. I find it hard to believe the
President would actually consider it, although as others have pointed out he
isn't going to rule it out. I think there are some idiots in the civilian
Pentagon house who would seriously consider the nuclear option as a first
strike capability.

On 4/18/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem I have is not with the first strike, but with a NUCLEAR
> first strike (or should I say nucular).
>
> I conceded that at times a first strike is neccessary, but is the
> opening of the nuclear option the right method?
>
>
--
---------------
Robert Munn
www.funkymojo.com


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:204581
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to