How many times are you going to bring out this argument that the
president lied? It's really tired that you always do this.
You lose an argument and a month later represent it as fact again
hoping people won't bather disputing it again.


On 4/19/06, GG wrote:
> > aSam wrote:
> > Funny thing is in this case they don't need them because we know where
> > their centrifuges are and a conventional bunker buster will take them
> > out very easily. But let them think a nuke might be coming if it
> > scares the shit out of them.
> >
> The problem is, Pres Bush has shown himself to be an irresponsible
> steward of force with Iraq: he claimed we were invading Iraq to
> prevent "a mushroom cloud", and trotted out Colin Powell to show the
> world our great intelligence.
>
> Not only does it turn out that there were no WMD, but that there were
> plenty of people in our government telling the President of this fact
> - he just ignored them and neglected to pass that information on the
> country.  He lied to us - if not outright, it was a lie of omission.
>
> So, Matt's got it right too - Bush is the President who cried wolf
> when there was none, and now he's finding himself in a pickle when
> there is one.
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:204730
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to